Damage to Trees
If a tree falls in the woods, someone may not hear it, but somebody might pay for it if that tree was cut on property of another without permission. Michigan…
Michigan Zoning of Short-Term Rentals
Whether deserved or not, many believe that the negative aspects of short-term rentals such as Airbnb, VRBO and Booking.com outweigh their benefits. They get blamed for a variety of problems…
A New Twist on the Statute of Limitations in Environmental Claims?
Statute of limitations require a person with a cause of action to bring suit within a specific period of time. Determining when that time period begins and ends is often…
EVICTION NOTICE VIA EMAIL
A landlord is allowed to institute summary proceedings to recover possession of leased property when a tenant is not paying rent. The process begins by serve of a written demand…
Court of Appeals Declares Some Foreclosures Invalid
A recent decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals has the potential to set aside previously granted foreclosures. In the consolidated cases of Residential Funding Co., LLC, f/k/a Residential Funding Corp. v Saurman and Bank of New York Trust Co. v Messner, (hereinafter “Residential Funding Co.”) the court held that certain foreclosures instituted by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (“MERS”) were invalid. (more…)
Michigan Ruling Restricting MERS Ability to Foreclose Given Retroactive Effect
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in Residential Funding Co, Inc. v Saurman, — NW2d —, 2011 WL 1516819 (Mich. App. April 21, 2011), that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) could not utilize the foreclosure by advertisement statute when it did not own the underlying note. (See previous blog posting of May 4, 2011). In Richard v Schneiderman & Sherman, P.C., — N.W.2d —-, 2011 WL 3760862 (Mich.App. (more…)
Michigan Supreme Court May Entertain Appeal of MERS Decision
The Michigan Supreme Court may weigh in on the question of whether Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) can use the foreclosure by advertisement statute. The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in Residential Funding Co, Inc. v Saurman, — NW2d —, 2011 WL 1516819 (Mich. App. April 21, 2011), that MERS could not utilize the foreclosure by advertisement statute when it did not own the underlying note. (more…)
Ramifications of Failure to Disclose Contamination
A recent Michigan Court of Appeals decision illustrates the ramifications of failure to fully disclose the presence of hazardous substances prior to the sale of real estate. The case of Alfieri v Bertorelli, — N.W.2d —-, 2011 WL 4949671 (Mich.App.) involved a condominium project built on a site previously used to manufacture pipe organs and picture frames. It also housed a cyanide based metal plating operation. (more…)
MERS 1, Homeowners 0
In Residential Funding Co., LLC, f/k/a Residential Funding Corp. v Saurman, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (“MERS”) could not pursue foreclosures under Michigan’s foreclosure by advertisement statute and that certain foreclosures already obtained were invalid. MERS was created by the lending industry to make it easier to sell home loans to investors. (more…)
RIP Michigan Economic Growth Authority Tax Credits
The Michigan Economic Growth Authority’s (MEGA) “flagship” program of offering tax credits to foster job creation ended its long run yesterday. Created in 1995, the MEGA tax credits were designed to attract and retain businesses in the State. Tax restructuring and creation of a new Corporate Income Tax sounded the death knell for the program. (more…)