The State of Michigan recently amended several laws that will significantly change the way liquid industrial wastes are regulated. The term “Liquid Industrial Waste” is being replaced by a new term, “Liquid industrial by-product.” The term liquid industrial by-product is defined similar to the former term “liquid industrial waste.” However, the list of specific materials and substances cited in the former definition has been deleted. The new term encompasses liquid materials produced by, that are incident to, or results from industrial, commercial or governmental activity. Manifests and site identification numbers are out. Shipping documents and a response plan are in. The new laws expand the remedies available for enforcement. The former statute contained a somewhat narrow remedy limited to recovery of damages to natural resources. The attorney general is now authorized to commence civil actions for violations of the amended statute including requests for injunctive relief.
A landlord is allowed to institute summary proceedings to recover possession of leased property when a tenant is not paying rent. The process begins by serve of a written demand for possession or payment upon the tenant. Service is accomplished by first class mail or personal delivery upon the tenant, family members or employees.
Reflecting the changing times and the modes by which people communicate, beginning August 19, 2015, a demand for possession or payment can be served by electronic means, such as email, if certain conditions are met. Those conditions include receipt of written consent from the tenant to allow electronic service and an affirmative acknowledgement of that consent. A landlord cannot refuse to enter a lease if the prospective tenant declines to consent to electronic service.
By Kevin A. Lavalle, Gault Davison PC and Jeffrey A. McCormack, Arcadia Environmental, LLC.
Prior to 1995, owners and operators of property were subject to strict liability for the cleanup of contaminated property. This liability scheme, commonly referred to as “draconian” by the commentators of the time, was abolished in 1995 by the Michigan Legislature and replaced with one based on fault. Continue reading
Spring time in Michigan inevitably brings with it flooding problems. The first step in resolving a flooding issue is determining whether the offending water is in a natural watercourse or merely represents the natural flow of surface water. The character of the water determines which set of rules apply. Continue reading
A recent decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals has the potential to set aside previously granted foreclosures. In the consolidated cases of Residential Funding Co., LLC, f/k/a Residential Funding Corp. v Saurman and Bank of New York Trust Co. v Messner, (hereinafter “Residential Funding Co.”) the court held that certain foreclosures instituted by Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (“MERS”) were invalid. Continue reading
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in Residential Funding Co, Inc. v Saurman, — NW2d —, 2011 WL 1516819 (Mich. App. April 21, 2011), that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) could not utilize the foreclosure by advertisement statute when it did not own the underlying note. (See previous blog posting of May 4, 2011). In Richard v Schneiderman & Sherman, P.C., — N.W.2d —-, 2011 WL 3760862 (Mich.App. Continue reading
The Michigan Supreme Court may weigh in on the question of whether Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) can use the foreclosure by advertisement statute. The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in Residential Funding Co, Inc. v Saurman, — NW2d —, 2011 WL 1516819 (Mich. App. April 21, 2011), that MERS could not utilize the foreclosure by advertisement statute when it did not own the underlying note. Continue reading
A recent Michigan Court of Appeals decision illustrates the ramifications of failure to fully disclose the presence of hazardous substances prior to the sale of real estate. The case of Alfieri v Bertorelli, — N.W.2d —-, 2011 WL 4949671 (Mich.App.) involved a condominium project built on a site previously used to manufacture pipe organs and picture frames. It also housed a cyanide based metal plating operation. Continue reading
In Residential Funding Co., LLC, f/k/a Residential Funding Corp. v Saurman, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (“MERS”) could not pursue foreclosures under Michigan’s foreclosure by advertisement statute and that certain foreclosures already obtained were invalid. MERS was created by the lending industry to make it easier to sell home loans to investors. Continue reading
The Michigan Economic Growth Authority’s (MEGA) “flagship” program of offering tax credits to foster job creation ended its long run yesterday. Created in 1995, the MEGA tax credits were designed to attract and retain businesses in the State. Tax restructuring and creation of a new Corporate Income Tax sounded the death knell for the program. Continue reading